Are chokeholds or carotid restraints permitted under California policy?

• A. Routinely allowed.
• B. Always used.
• C. Only during crowd control.
• D. Generally prohibited or severely restricted.

Answer: (D)

Chokeholds and carotid restraints are treated as high‑risk, dangerous techniques in California policy and are not allowed as a normal options. They are generally prohibited or severely restricted because using them can quickly cut off blood flow to the brain or airway, potentially leading to serious injury or death, especially if the person is restrained on the ground or has underlying health issues.

The idea behind the policy is that use of force must be objectively reasonable and proportional to the threat, with a strong emphasis on de‑escalation and preserving life. Safer alternatives and de‑escalation strategies are preferred, and officers are trained to rely on less‑lethal tools and control methods that minimize the risk of asphyxia or trauma. If any limited use is allowed, it’s typically under very strict criteria, with extensive oversight, and often only as a last resort for imminent life threats.

Why the other options don’t fit: these holds are not considered routine or universal tools; they’re not something officers are expected to use in all situations, or only in crowd control, or in every encounter. The prevailing policy stance is to prohibit or severely restrict them due to the grave safety risks involved.