Name one common exception to the exclusionary rule.

• A. Inevitable discovery.
• B. Exigent circumstances where delay would create risk.
• C. Good-faith reliance on a defective warrant.
• D. Plain view doctrine.

Answer: (C)

The main idea is that the exclusionary rule has recognized exceptions, with the good-faith reliance on a warrant being a prominent one. When police officers reasonably believe a warrant is valid and act on that belief, the evidence seized under that warrant can be admitted even if the warrant is later found defective. This good-faith exception, established in cases like United States v. Leon, buffers the rule’s harshness for honest mistakes by law enforcement while keeping the deterrent effect intact for reckless or deliberate violations. The key is that the belief in the warrant’s validity must be objectively reasonable and not the result of lawless conduct.

Inevitable discovery and plain view relate to admissibility in other contexts, and exigent circumstances address warrantless actions in emergencies. They are valid doctrines in their own right, but the best-known and most directly applicable exception to the exclusionary rule described here is the good-faith reliance on a defective warrant.